-
Recent Posts
- FCA urges FCC to work in collaboration with states, not preempt their authority
- PUD to get out of battery-backup business for fiber-based telephones
- PUD trends signal $92.5 million in year-end balances at Chelan PUD
- Finally, an opinion that puts the blame where it belongs
- Reason says U.S. facitilities-based broadband competition is key to continued growth
Categories
- Around the Country
- Benton PUD
- California
- Chelan PUD
- Click Network
- Duplicate Facilities
- FCA Letters and Op-Eds
- Federal Action and Grants
- financial feasibility
- Franklin PUD
- government competition
- government-owned fiber
- government-owned networks
- Grant PUD
- Legal Authority
- Municipal broadband
- Municipal finance
- NoaNet
- OPALCO
- Overbuilding
- Public disclosure
- public wi-fi
- PUD Retailing
- Rural broadband
- Tennessee
- U.S. Broadband Policy
- UTOPIA
- Welcome Statement
Archives
Meta
Category Archives: PUD Retailing
Government competition with private providers should always concern taxpayers and utility ratepayers
The Seattle Times reports that the Washington State Auditor has told the city of Lynnwood that further loans from the city’s utility to the city’s municipal golf course are not allowed, because according to the article, “the golf course can’t afford to … Continue reading
Municipalization on the general election ballot
With Washington’s primary elections behind us we are now set for a couple of key municipalization races in this fall’s general. In Thurston County the PUD is not only running an initiative asking voters for the authority to deliver public power, but … Continue reading
